Language selection

Search CSPS

Departmental Plan 2017–2018: Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy

1. Overview of the federal government's approach to sustainable development

2. Departmental commitments under the 2016–19 FSDS

Goal Low-carbon government: The Government leads by example by making its operations low-carbon.

FSDS target(s)


FSDS indicator(s)

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Starting point

In the 2016–19 FSDS, the Government of Canada identified its buildings as the largest source of GHG from government operations and therefore the key focus to reduce these emissions.

FSDS milestone(s) and key priorities

Milestone(s) supported by the department

Key priority supported by the department

Government buildings are the largest source of GHG emissions from operations and as such will be the key focus in reducing these emissions.

Contributing action: Improve the energy efficiency of our buildings

Departmental actions

The School is working with PSPC to develop and implement a long-term facilities plan for the School's operations. The primary objective is to modernize and make efficient use of work and classroom space to reduce the organization's footprint and energy consumption. This initiative is currently in the planning phase and will be gradually implemented beginning in 2017–18.

Link to department's Program Inventory

1.1 Learning Services

Expected results for 2017–18 and performance indicator(s)

Expected results

The modernization of the School's facilities is a multiyear initiative that is projected to begin in 2017–18. Once completed, the initiative is expected to reduce the School's carbon footprint and energy consumption. As previously noted, this initiative is in the planning phase, and the timeline for completion has not yet been determined.

Performance indicator(s)

Completion of the School's long term facilities plan and launch of the implementation phase

Alignment with 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development goals and targets

Contributing action: Support the transition to a low-carbon economy through green procurement

Support clean technologies and green products and services by taking environmental considerations into account in our purchasing decisions.

Departmental actions

Link to department's Program Inventory

1.1 Learning Services

Expected results for 2017–18 and performance indicator(s)

Expected results

Environmentally responsible acquisition, use and disposal of goods and services

Performance indicator(s)

Continue to take action to embed environmental considerations in accordance with the Policy on Green Procurement

All procurement administration incorporates environmental considerations

Dispose of surplus material in a responsible manner

Reduce disposal of e-waste and promote recycling of office supplies

Continue to safely dispose metal and chemical products, in accordance with international recycling standards

Leverage common-use procurement instruments where available and feasible

Increase awareness of the Policy on Green Procurement among managers

Alignment with 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development goals and targets

3. Additional departmental sustainable development activities and initiatives not captured by the 2016–19 FSDS

Goal Low-carbon government: The Government leads by example by making its operations low-carbon.

FSDS indicator(s)

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Starting point

As the common learning service provider for the federal public service, the School's approach to the delivery of learning can promote sustainable practices for employee travel within the public service.

In May 2016, the School introduced a flexible, easy-to-access online platform called GCcampus. This online platform has become the main portal to an increasingly rich and diverse collection of learning resources, including online courses, virtual classrooms, peer and social learning, videos, webcasts, job aids, workshops and other learning events. All of these resources are available anytime and from anywhere, making learning more accessible to public service employees regardless of where they are located.

More accessible learning is also more efficient. Prior to the School's shift towards an online learning platform, public service employees outside the National Capital Region had fewer courses available to them. With an increased range of online learning opportunities that do not require travel, there has been an almost three-fold increase in public service employees taking on line training across Canada since 2011 (from 44,832 in 2011–12 to 129,651 in 2015–16).

FSDS milestone(s) and key priorities

Milestone(s) supported by the department

Key priority supported by the department

No specific FSDS priority has been identified. The School's shift towards an online learning platform, however, supports the low-carbon government goal by reducing the need for employee travel to access learning opportunities.

Contributing action: Promote sustainable travel practices

Promote sustainable practices for employee travel—including business travel and commuting to work—such as teleconferencing, telecommuting, carpooling, and use of electric vehicles and public transportation. Where feasible, offer offsetting options to reduce the impact of government travel.

Departmental actions

The School will continue to update the learning content in GCcampus to ensure that it remains aligned with government priorities and responsive to the learning needs of public service employees. The percentage of online learners will also continue to be tracked to measure the level of participation and variations over time.

Link to department's Program Inventory

1.1 Learning Services

Expected results for 2017–18 and performance indicator(s)

Expected results

Reduced requirement for travel by public service employees to access learning opportunities will have a positive impact on the carbon footprint.

Performance indicator(s)

Reduced travel requirements to the National Capital Region for learners across Canada.

Alignment with 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development goals and targets

4. Sustainable development decision making

   5. Strategic environmental assessment


Date modified: